Skip navigation View an alternate layout of this website with limited styles and no horizontal scrolling
Menu

Effect of an Intelligent Prosthesis (IP) on the Walking Ability of Young Transfemoral Amputees

By Chin, T.; Sawamura, S.; Shiba, R.; Oyabu, H.; Nagakura, Y.; Takase, I.; Machida, K.; Nakagawa, A.; Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 82, No. 6, pp. 447-451
Publication Date: June 2003

Study compares energy expenditure and walking speeds between people who are able-bodied and people who use Intelligent Prostheses (IP) to demonstrate the effect of IP on the walking ability of young people with lower-extremity amputations. Six men and two women between the ages of eighteen and twenty-six with unilateral transfemoral amputations participated in the study. None of the participants had been fitted with a prosthesis prior to the study. The participants’ measurements of energy expenditure were conducted using a portable telemetric system called a K4 system. The system measured oxygen uptake, carbon dioxide production, heart rate, and minute ventilation. The mean value of the last two minutes of a fifteen-minute test walk was taken as the measurement value. Data from the participants were compared with data from a control group of people without amputations. On average, the participants who used IP experienced an oxygen uptake that was higher than that of the control group.
Published by: W.B. Saunders Company, a division of Elsevier Health Sciences   (Website:http://us.elsevierhealth.com)
American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation    (Web Site: http://www.aapmr.org/ )
American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine    (Web Site: http://www.acrm.org )

AbleData, 8630 Fenton Street, Suite 930, Silver Spring, MD 20910. 1-800-227-0216.
Maintained for the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research of the U.S. Dept. of Education
by ICF Macro under Contract No. ED-04-CO-0018/0007.

The records in AbleData are provided for information purposes only. Neither the U.S. Department of Education nor ICF Macro has examined, reviewed, or tested any product, device, or information contained in AbleData. The Department and ICF Macro make no endorsement, representation, or warranty express or implied as to any product, device, or information set forth in AbleData. The views expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Department of Education, the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, or ICF Macro.