Skip navigation View an alternate layout of this website with limited styles and no horizontal scrolling
Menu

Quantitative Data on Young Child Language Use: Implications for AAC

By Banajee, Meher; Baker, Bruce; Anderson, Annalee; Closing the Gap, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 1, 10-13, 28
Publication Date: August/September 2003

Article discusses the implications of quantitative data on young child language in the use of alternative and augmentative communication (AAC) devices. Unprompted vocabulary was collected from 50 toddlers between the ages of 24 and 36 months. The participants were enrolled in five different preschools, and vocabulary was recorded during two activities: (1) play within interest centers, and (2) snack time. All participants were screened using the Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ), which is a parent completed, child-monitoring system. The ASQ indicated that the participants were functioning at age-appropriate developmental levels, and that they used a variety of two to three word utterances, spontaneously initiated interaction, maintained interaction by taking turns, terminated interaction appropriately, and consistently followed simple one-step directives and some two-step directives without gestures. Results revealed that all of the participants used nine common words, which included pronouns, verbs, prepositions, and demonstratives. The authors conclude that it is important to consider the role of pragmatics, semantics, and syntax of language while engaging in vocabulary selection and AAC intervention.

Assistive Products Discussed: AGES & STAGES QUESTIONNAIRES, THIRD EDITION (ASQ-3)
Published by: Closing the Gap, Inc.   (Website:http://www.closingthegap.com)

AbleData, 8630 Fenton Street, Suite 930, Silver Spring, MD 20910. 1-800-227-0216.
Maintained for the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research of the U.S. Dept. of Education
by ICF Macro under Contract No. ED-04-CO-0018/0007.

The records in AbleData are provided for information purposes only. Neither the U.S. Department of Education nor ICF Macro has examined, reviewed, or tested any product, device, or information contained in AbleData. The Department and ICF Macro make no endorsement, representation, or warranty express or implied as to any product, device, or information set forth in AbleData. The views expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Department of Education, the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, or ICF Macro.