Skip navigation View an alternate layout of this website with limited styles and no horizontal scrolling
Menu

Long-Handled Sponges: To Bend or Not To Bend

By Sevey, Kimberly L., MOTR/L; Rice, Martin S., PhD, OTR/L; Assistive Technology, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 91-97
Publication Date: Winter 2002

Study compares upper extremity range of motion when using a straight-handled sponge versus a bent-handled long-handled sponge. Range of motion can decreased with the onset of disorders such as arthritis, osteoporosis, Parkinson’s disease, or cerebral vascular accident due to joint inflammation, pain, apraxia, weakness, or spasticity. Thirty-eight participants ranging in age from 20 to 44 years were randomly assigned to one of two order groups: straight-bent or bent-straight. The study task measured right upper extremity range of motion by having each participant touch a buzzer placed over thoracic vertebrae six and seven with the long-handled sponge. Significant range of motion differences were found in wrist flexion-extension, elbow flexion-extension, and shoulder abduction-adduction between the straight-handled and the bent-handled long-handled sponge. No significant differences were found with ulnar and radial deviation of the wrist, wrist supination-pronation, or shoulder flexion. These results suggest that within a normal population, the bent handle may be more beneficial to individuals who have decreased range of motion in shoulder abduction-adduction and wrist flexion-extension, while the straight handle may be more accommodating to people with decreased range of motion in the elbow.
Published by: Rehabilitation Engineering & Assistive Technology Society of North America (RESNA)   (Website:http://www.resna.org)

This publication is included in the library of the National Rehabilitation Information Center (NARIC), accession number J46742

AbleData, 8630 Fenton Street, Suite 930, Silver Spring, MD 20910. 1-800-227-0216.
Maintained for the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research of the U.S. Dept. of Education
by ICF Macro under Contract No. ED-04-CO-0018/0007.

The records in AbleData are provided for information purposes only. Neither the U.S. Department of Education nor ICF Macro has examined, reviewed, or tested any product, device, or information contained in AbleData. The Department and ICF Macro make no endorsement, representation, or warranty express or implied as to any product, device, or information set forth in AbleData. The views expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Department of Education, the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, or ICF Macro.