Skip navigation View an alternate layout of this website with limited styles and no horizontal scrolling
Menu

Augmentative and Alternative Communication Technology Learning Part 1: Augmentative and Alternative Communication Intervention Specialists

By Burke, Rebecca; Beukelman, David R.; Ball, Laura; Horn, Christy A.; Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC), Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 242-249
Publication Date: December 2002

Study focused on the learning styles and preferences of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) intervention specialists. Specifically, the researchers examined AAC intervention specialists’: (1) self-efficacy for AAC intervention, (2) goal achievement orientation, (3) computer technology interest levels, and (4) learning mode preferences regarding AAC. The results indicated that AAC intervention specialists viewed themselves as highly self-confident in their ability to learn how to utilize new AAC technology and teach it to others. Interest in computer technology was reported as low, while the specialists preferred individual and small-group learning in comparison with direct instruction in new technology. Implications for future research directions are discussed.
Published by: International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (ISAAC)   (Website:http://www.isaac-online.org)

This publication is included in the library of the National Rehabilitation Information Center (NARIC), accession number J44653

AbleData, 8630 Fenton Street, Suite 930, Silver Spring, MD 20910. 1-800-227-0216.
Maintained for the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research of the U.S. Dept. of Education
by ICF Macro under Contract No. ED-04-CO-0018/0007.

The records in AbleData are provided for information purposes only. Neither the U.S. Department of Education nor ICF Macro has examined, reviewed, or tested any product, device, or information contained in AbleData. The Department and ICF Macro make no endorsement, representation, or warranty express or implied as to any product, device, or information set forth in AbleData. The views expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Department of Education, the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, or ICF Macro.