Skip navigation View an alternate layout of this website with limited styles and no horizontal scrolling
Menu

Development of a Scale to Measure the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices: Lessons Learned and the Road Ahead

By Day, H.; Jutai, J.; Campbell, K. A.; Disability and Rehabilitation, Vol. 24, No. 1/2/3, pp. 31-37
Publication Date: 2002

Paper provides a review of the development and validation of the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS). The PIADS is a 26-item self-rating scale designed to quantify how people who use assistive technology (AT) perceive the impact of their devices on their overall quality of life. The challenges that the researchers encountered in attempting to apply this quantification in a measure that suitable for application to the use of all types of AT are explored. Current efforts to extend the validation of the PIADS are also summarized. The authors found that the PIADS is a reliable and valid tool, and that it appears to be very reliable in predicting AT abandonment and retention. Directions for future research and scale development are suggested.

Assistive Products Discussed: PSYCHOSOCIAL IMPACT OF ASSISTIVE DEVICES SCALE (PIADS)
Published by: Taylor & Francis, Limited   (Website:http://taylorandfrancis.org)

International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine    (Web Site: http://www.isprm.org )

AbleData, 8630 Fenton Street, Suite 930, Silver Spring, MD 20910. 1-800-227-0216.
Maintained for the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research of the U.S. Dept. of Education
by ICF Macro under Contract No. ED-04-CO-0018/0007.

The records in AbleData are provided for information purposes only. Neither the U.S. Department of Education nor ICF Macro has examined, reviewed, or tested any product, device, or information contained in AbleData. The Department and ICF Macro make no endorsement, representation, or warranty express or implied as to any product, device, or information set forth in AbleData. The views expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Department of Education, the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, or ICF Macro.