Skip navigation View an alternate layout of this website with limited styles and no horizontal scrolling
Menu

The Orpington Prognostic Scale for Patients With Stroke: Reliability and Pilot Predictive Data for Discharge Destination and Therapeutic Services

By Reick, Mary; Moreland, Julie; Disability and Rehabilitation, Vol. 27, No. 23, pp. 1425-1433
Publication Date: December 2005

Study conducted to determine the inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the Orpington Prognostic Scale (OPS), which is an assessment of motor deficit, receptiveness to stimuli, balance, and cognition. The assessment is presented in questionnaire format, and can be administered in roughly five minutes. A total of 94 people who were admitted to the hospital because of a stroke participated in the study. Pairs of physiotherapists and occupational therapists administered the OPS to the participants on days seven and fourteen following stroke. A statistical analysis of the scores are presented. The authors found that the OPS did have high inter-rater and test-retest reliability, though also had limited predictive accuracy for discharge destination. The scale was also found to be a poor predictor of follow-up services. The OPS is presented in the articles’ appendix.
Published by: Taylor & Francis, Limited   (Website:http://taylorandfrancis.org)
International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine    (Web Site: http://www.isprm.org )

AbleData, 8630 Fenton Street, Suite 930, Silver Spring, MD 20910. 1-800-227-0216.
Maintained for the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research of the U.S. Dept. of Education
by ICF Macro under Contract No. ED-04-CO-0018/0007.

The records in AbleData are provided for information purposes only. Neither the U.S. Department of Education nor ICF Macro has examined, reviewed, or tested any product, device, or information contained in AbleData. The Department and ICF Macro make no endorsement, representation, or warranty express or implied as to any product, device, or information set forth in AbleData. The views expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Department of Education, the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, or ICF Macro.