Skip navigation View an alternate layout of this website with limited styles and no horizontal scrolling
Menu

Knowledge of and Preference for Long Cane Components: A Qualitative and Quantitative Study

By Ambrose-Zaken, Grace; Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, Vol. 99, No. 10, pp. 633-645
Publication Date: October 2005

Article provides a literature review on the various components of long canes, and reports on a study of the knowledge and preferences of 100 adults with visual disabilities on the various types and components of canes. A number of cane components were evaluated, including: (1) tips, (2) coatings, (3) length, (4) shaft, (5) grips, and (6) brands. Studies indicated that brand names were important to consumers, as four participants in one study scored the Americane, which is a telescoping cane, below average to poor on all criteria. Eleven participants scored the Safe-T-Lite Cane, which is a cane with a strobe light mounted to the shaft to increase visibility, as poor. Overall results from the comprehensive literature review indicated that route terrain, weather conditions, mobility demand, and purposes of specific outings were important factors in choosing a cane. A discussion of study limitations is included.

Assistive Products Discussed: WAYNE WALSH SAFE-T-LITE CANE
AMERICANE
Published by: AFB Press   (Website:http://www.afb.org/Section.asp?SectionID=46)

American Foundation for the Blind (AFB)    (Web Site: http://www.afb.org )

AbleData, 8630 Fenton Street, Suite 930, Silver Spring, MD 20910. 1-800-227-0216.
Maintained for the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research of the U.S. Dept. of Education
by ICF Macro under Contract No. ED-04-CO-0018/0007.

The records in AbleData are provided for information purposes only. Neither the U.S. Department of Education nor ICF Macro has examined, reviewed, or tested any product, device, or information contained in AbleData. The Department and ICF Macro make no endorsement, representation, or warranty express or implied as to any product, device, or information set forth in AbleData. The views expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Department of Education, the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, or ICF Macro.