Skip navigation View an alternate layout of this website with limited styles and no horizontal scrolling
Menu

Toward an Evaluation Methodology for Computer Accessibility

By Kadouche, R.; Abdulrazak, B.; Mokhtari, M.; ICOST 2004, 2nd International Conference on Smart Homes and Health Telematics: Toward a Human-Friendly Assistive Environment, Vol. 14, pp. 49-56
Publication Date: 2004

Research discusses the accessibility of assistive technology for people with severe disabilities, and focuses on the provision of quantitative and qualitative evaluation methodologies of computer access interfaces. The evaluation methodologies are applied to the design of technology for people with severe motor disabilities, particularly trackball, mouse, and joystick interfaces. Three main criteria are applied to the technology in order to evaluate their usability: (1) accuracy of the cursor, (2) ability to carry out a simple click, double click, and drag-and-drop task, and (3) time necessary to complete the task. User tests with the three input technologies were conducted with participants with quadriplegia and muscular dystrophy. Preliminary results indicate that a mouse was the most effective input device overall, though further research is warranted due to the small sample size of the study.
Published by: IOS Press   (Website:http://www.iospress.nl)

ISBN: 1-58603-457-X
This publication is included in the library of the National Rehabilitation Information Center (NARIC), accession number R08566

AbleData, 8630 Fenton Street, Suite 930, Silver Spring, MD 20910. 1-800-227-0216.
Maintained for the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research of the U.S. Dept. of Education
by ICF Macro under Contract No. ED-04-CO-0018/0007.

The records in AbleData are provided for information purposes only. Neither the U.S. Department of Education nor ICF Macro has examined, reviewed, or tested any product, device, or information contained in AbleData. The Department and ICF Macro make no endorsement, representation, or warranty express or implied as to any product, device, or information set forth in AbleData. The views expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Department of Education, the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, or ICF Macro.