Skip navigation View an alternate layout of this website with limited styles and no horizontal scrolling
Menu

@Iphatec - A Pilot Study on Outcomes of Computer Assisted Reading and Writing for Adults With Dyslexia

By Arendal, Erik; Brandt, Ase; Assistive Technology: From Virtuality to Reality, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 735-739
Publication Date: 2005

Study conducted to evaluate the outcomes of computer assisted reading and writing in combination with computer training for people with disabilities that affect reading and writing. The following computer devices were used in the study, which are collectively referred to as the IT Rucksack: (1) Windows 98/2000/XP, (2) microphone and headphones, (3) the Internet, (4) e-mail, (5) standard word processing software, (6) text-to-speech and word prediction software, (7) a scanner, and (8) optical character recognition software. A total of 19 people with dyslexia participated in the study, and received roughly 40 days of computer training. The results indicated that the training had a significant impact on reading and writing skills, and that computer assistance played a major part in the improvements. The authors contend that the sample size for the study was small, and that a full-scale study is warranted in order to further evaluate wider implications for assistive reading and writing technology. This study was conducted by researchers at the Danish Centre for Assistive Technology in Denmark.
Published by: IOS Press   (Website:http://www.iospress.nl)

Association for the Advancement of Assistive Technology in Europe (AAATE)    (Web Site: http://www.aaate.net )
Link to text: http://iospress.metapress.com/link.asp?id=w28q5qq0t4tjywqd

AbleData, 8630 Fenton Street, Suite 930, Silver Spring, MD 20910. 1-800-227-0216.
Maintained for the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research of the U.S. Dept. of Education
by ICF Macro under Contract No. ED-04-CO-0018/0007.

The records in AbleData are provided for information purposes only. Neither the U.S. Department of Education nor ICF Macro has examined, reviewed, or tested any product, device, or information contained in AbleData. The Department and ICF Macro make no endorsement, representation, or warranty express or implied as to any product, device, or information set forth in AbleData. The views expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Department of Education, the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, or ICF Macro.