Skip navigation View an alternate layout of this website with limited styles and no horizontal scrolling
Menu

Use of Aided Language Stimulation to Improve Syntactic Performance During a Weeklong Intervention Program

By Bruno, Joan; Trembath, David; Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC), Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 300-313
Publication Date: December 2006

Study conducted to evaluate the performance of nine children ages four to fourteen who used augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems before and after a weeklong aided language stimulation intervention program. The exact AAC systems the participants used are listed in table format, along with the number of years the participant had used the device. The following systems were utilized: (1) DynaMyte, (2) Pathfinder, (3) E-Talk, (4) DynaVox, and (5) a communication board. The results indicated that use of these devices improved the participants’ overall communication patterns, while the communication board was more effective when compared with the more high-tech devices. Implications for future research are discussed.

Assistive Products Discussed: E-TALK (MODELS CS 5500, CS 6400, & CS 8400)
DYNAVOX 3100
DYNAMYTE 3100
PATHFINDER
E-TALK TABLET WITH CRADLE
DYNAVOX V
DYNAVOX VMAX
Published by: International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (ISAAC)   (Website:http://www.isaac-online.org)

AbleData, 8630 Fenton Street, Suite 930, Silver Spring, MD 20910. 1-800-227-0216.
Maintained for the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research of the U.S. Dept. of Education
by ICF Macro under Contract No. ED-04-CO-0018/0007.

The records in AbleData are provided for information purposes only. Neither the U.S. Department of Education nor ICF Macro has examined, reviewed, or tested any product, device, or information contained in AbleData. The Department and ICF Macro make no endorsement, representation, or warranty express or implied as to any product, device, or information set forth in AbleData. The views expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Department of Education, the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, or ICF Macro.