Skip navigation View an alternate layout of this website with limited styles and no horizontal scrolling
Menu

A Phantom for the Evaluation of Pressure Relief Surfaces

By Bain, Duncan; Nicholson, Graham,; Ferguson-Pell, Martin; Davies, Patrick; RESNA 2000: Technology for the New Millenium, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 363-365
Publication Date: June/July 2000

Paper describing a phantom that can be used for the evaluation of pressure relief surfaces. Pressure ulcers were believed to affect over five percent of all hospital in-patients, and many others in the community. Devices such as specialized beds, mattresses, chairs, and cushions that distribute pressure evenly have proven to be effective in managing and preventing ulcers. These devices must be evaluated periodically for effectiveness in pressure relief. An instrumented articulated anthropometric phantom was developed with simulated soft body "tissues" in the gluteal and sacral areas. The phantom consists of an articulated body, which is segmented into head, torso, upper legs, and lower legs. Each segment has an adjustable mass at its center of gravity to mimic different body weights and pressure distributions. The weight of the phantom is adjustable between 50 and 90 kilograms. Data obtained using the device were compared to data obtained from a live healthy volunteer. Results indicated that the phantom represented realistic physiological conditions.
Published by: Rehabilitation Engineering & Assistive Technology Society of North America (RESNA)   (Website:http://www.resna.org)

ISBN: 0-932101-42-9
This publication is included in the library of the National Rehabilitation Information Center (NARIC), accession number O13708

AbleData, 8630 Fenton Street, Suite 930, Silver Spring, MD 20910. 1-800-227-0216.
Maintained for the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research of the U.S. Dept. of Education
by ICF Macro under Contract No. ED-04-CO-0018/0007.

The records in AbleData are provided for information purposes only. Neither the U.S. Department of Education nor ICF Macro has examined, reviewed, or tested any product, device, or information contained in AbleData. The Department and ICF Macro make no endorsement, representation, or warranty express or implied as to any product, device, or information set forth in AbleData. The views expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Department of Education, the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, or ICF Macro.