Skip navigation View an alternate layout of this website with limited styles and no horizontal scrolling
Menu

Measuring the Cost Utility of Electronic Aids to Daily Living

By Rigby, Patty; Campbell, Kent; Cooper, Barbara; Ryan, Steve; Steggles, Elizabeth; Tam, Cynthia; Proceedings of the RESNA 25th International Conference, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 143-145
Publication Date: June/July 2002

Study evaluating the reliability and validity of measures examining the cost utility of electronic aids to daily living (EADL). Three points are discussed: (1) the approach to cost utility analysis tested in the study, (2) the rationale for including the content in the assessment protocol, and (3) opportunities for research and future study. The cost utility analysis is evaluated regarding the following content: type and frequency of daily occupations, frequency and intensity of care received, household income, ability and satisfaction with performing tasks that can be enabled with EADL, interpersonal relationships, safety, security, and quality of life. The content validity of the protocol was obtained from the following four sources: (1) thematic analysis of qualitative data obtained through semi-structured interviews with EADL users and nonusers, (2) focus groups with key informants, (3) results from previous studies, and (4) a literature review. The study included evaluations of EADL use by people with quadriplegia due to spinal cord injury or disease.
Published by: Rehabilitation Engineering & Assistive Technology Society of North America (RESNA)   (Website:http://www.resna.org)

ISBN: 00-932101-44-5
This publication is included in the library of the National Rehabilitation Information Center (NARIC), accession number O14501

AbleData, 8630 Fenton Street, Suite 930, Silver Spring, MD 20910. 1-800-227-0216.
Maintained for the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research of the U.S. Dept. of Education
by ICF Macro under Contract No. ED-04-CO-0018/0007.

The records in AbleData are provided for information purposes only. Neither the U.S. Department of Education nor ICF Macro has examined, reviewed, or tested any product, device, or information contained in AbleData. The Department and ICF Macro make no endorsement, representation, or warranty express or implied as to any product, device, or information set forth in AbleData. The views expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Department of Education, the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, or ICF Macro.