Skip navigation View an alternate layout of this website with limited styles and no horizontal scrolling
Menu

The Functional Evaluation in a Wheelchair (FEW) Instrument: Test-Retest Reliability and Cross-Validation with Consumer Goals

By Mills, Tamara; Holm, Margo B., PhD; Schmeler, Mark; Trefler, Elaine; Fitzgerald; Proceedings of the RESNA 25th International Conference, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 245-247
Publication Date: June/July 2002

Study examining the test-retest reliability and cross-validation with consumer goals of the Functional Evaluation in a Wheelchair (FEW) Beta Version 1.0 instrument. Four databases with consumer goals for seating-mobility technology were used to cross-validate the content of the FEW items: (1) an Internet-based study database, (2) a telerehabilitation study database, (3) a CAT medicalized and (4) a CAT consumer-reported clinical database. Results are displayed in table-format. Findings indicated that the FEW Beta Version 1.0 was highly stable in its measurement of seating-mobility goals over a one-week interval. Test-retest reliability indicated that it was highly stable across time.
Published by: Rehabilitation Engineering & Assistive Technology Society of North America (RESNA)   (Website:http://www.resna.org)

ISBN: 00-932101-44-5
This publication is included in the library of the National Rehabilitation Information Center (NARIC), accession number O14532

AbleData, 8630 Fenton Street, Suite 930, Silver Spring, MD 20910. 1-800-227-0216.
Maintained for the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research of the U.S. Dept. of Education
by ICF Macro under Contract No. ED-04-CO-0018/0007.

The records in AbleData are provided for information purposes only. Neither the U.S. Department of Education nor ICF Macro has examined, reviewed, or tested any product, device, or information contained in AbleData. The Department and ICF Macro make no endorsement, representation, or warranty express or implied as to any product, device, or information set forth in AbleData. The views expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Department of Education, the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, or ICF Macro.