Skip navigation View an alternate layout of this website with limited styles and no horizontal scrolling
Menu

Comparison of A Priori Alignment Techniques for Transtibial Prostheses in the Developing World -- Pilot Study

By Reisinger, Kim D.; Casanova, Hector; Wu, Yeongchi; Moorer, Celene; Disability and Rehabilitation, Vol. 29, No. 11, pp. 863-872
Publication Date: June 2007

Comparison study to test a simplified alignment procedure, developed in partnership between the Center for International Rehabilitation (CIR) in Chicago and Prosthetic Research Study (PRS) in Seattle, capturing transtibial alignment metrics during a patient’s initial visit, following an evaluation and casting session, before a prosthesis is fabricated. Five transtibial amputees and five prosthetists were recruited for the study. Each prosthetist used each of three alignment systems based on the anatomically-based-alignment (ABA) and vertical alignment axis (VAA) theories, the ABA-standing, ABA-supine and VAA systems, to capture alignment measurements for one subject. Three monolimbs were fabricated for each amputee participant and assessed during clinical static and dynamic gait conditions. Training materials and methods were also evaluated. All three systems were found to capture acceptable alignments, with each system having its own advantages in terms of ease of use, required equipment and ease of technology transfer, which has positive implications for providing prosthetic devices to remote areas of landmine-affected countries.
Published by: Taylor & Francis, Limited   (Website:http://taylorandfrancis.org)

International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine    (Web Site: http://www.isprm.org )

AbleData, 8630 Fenton Street, Suite 930, Silver Spring, MD 20910. 1-800-227-0216.
Maintained for the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research of the U.S. Dept. of Education
by ICF Macro under Contract No. ED-04-CO-0018/0007.

The records in AbleData are provided for information purposes only. Neither the U.S. Department of Education nor ICF Macro has examined, reviewed, or tested any product, device, or information contained in AbleData. The Department and ICF Macro make no endorsement, representation, or warranty express or implied as to any product, device, or information set forth in AbleData. The views expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Department of Education, the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, or ICF Macro.