Skip navigation View an alternate layout of this website with limited styles and no horizontal scrolling
Menu

In-The-Ear Measurements of Interference in Hearing Aids from Digital Wireless Telephones

By Levitt, Harry, PhD; Kozma-Spytek, Linda, MA; Harkins, Judith, PhD; Seminars in Hearing, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 87-98
Publication Date: 2005

Study identified the acoustic signal-to-interference ratio (SIR) requirements for various levels of digital wireless telephone usability for people who wear hearing aids. Digital wireless telephones produce audible electromagnetic interference in hearing aids. Forty-two hearing aid wearers listened to a telephone conversation through a dummy wireless phone while interference levels varied using a second phone programmed to deliver a controlled electromagnetic field. Real-ear recordings of the speech with interference were made at each rating point of usability. Signal analyses of the recordings indicate that for 90 percent of the subjects, SIRs in the 28- to 32-dB range were needed to achieve a rating of highly usable, SIRs in the 20- to 24-dB range were needed for a rating of minor limitations on use, and SIRs in the 12-to 15-dB range were needed for a rating of major limitation on use.
Published by: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.   (Website:http://www.thieme.com)

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association    (Web Site: http://www.asha.org )

AbleData, 8630 Fenton Street, Suite 930, Silver Spring, MD 20910. 1-800-227-0216.
Maintained for the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research of the U.S. Dept. of Education
by ICF Macro under Contract No. ED-04-CO-0018/0007.

The records in AbleData are provided for information purposes only. Neither the U.S. Department of Education nor ICF Macro has examined, reviewed, or tested any product, device, or information contained in AbleData. The Department and ICF Macro make no endorsement, representation, or warranty express or implied as to any product, device, or information set forth in AbleData. The views expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Department of Education, the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, or ICF Macro.