Skip navigation View an alternate layout of this website with limited styles and no horizontal scrolling
Menu

Ancient Egyptian Artificial Toes Could Be World’s Earliest Prostheses

By Coxworth, Ben; Gizmag,
Publication Date: February 14, 2011

Article reports on the scientific testing of two ancient Egyptian artificial toes to determine their possible function as walking prostheses. One toe, housed in the Egyptian Museum in Cairo, is composed of 3 joined parts made from wood and leather; the other, known as the Greville Chester toe and residing in the British Museum, is made of a linen, glue, and plaster substance called cartonnage. The toes, which date from before 600 B.C.E., were tested at the University of Manchester in England using the following criteria: (1) consisting of material that withstands bodily forces; (2) possessing lifelike proportions and appearance; (3) easy to don and doff; and (4) able to assist walking, given that the big toe is estimated to support about 40 percent of the body weight during ambulation. Gait analysis technology incorporating cameras and pressure devices placed along a walkway was utilized while volunteer big toe amputees wearing the toes along with replica ancient Egyptian sandals walked its length. According to scientists conducting the tests, findings strongly suggested that both designs were capable of functioning as replacements for the amputated toe, with the Cairo toe, featuring an integrated hinge, being said by participants to be particularly comfortable.
Published by: Gizmag Pty Ltd   (Website:http://www.gizmag.com/)

Link to text: http://www.gizmag.com/ancient-egyptian-artificial-toes-could-be-worlds-earliest-prostheses/17878

AbleData, 8630 Fenton Street, Suite 930, Silver Spring, MD 20910. 1-800-227-0216.
Maintained for the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research of the U.S. Dept. of Education
by ICF Macro under Contract No. ED-04-CO-0018/0007.

The records in AbleData are provided for information purposes only. Neither the U.S. Department of Education nor ICF Macro has examined, reviewed, or tested any product, device, or information contained in AbleData. The Department and ICF Macro make no endorsement, representation, or warranty express or implied as to any product, device, or information set forth in AbleData. The views expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Department of Education, the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, or ICF Macro.