Skip navigation View an alternate layout of this website with limited styles and no horizontal scrolling
Menu

Long Term Cost-Effectiveness of Screening Strategies for Hearing Loss

By Liu, Chuan-Fen; Collins, Margaret P.; Souza, Pamela E.; Yueh, Bevan; Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 235-244
Publication Date: 2011

Study explored the cost-effectiveness of hearing screening in a general population of older veterans. Participants were 2,251 older veterans. The cost effectiveness of 3 screening strategies: tone-emitting otoscope, hearing handicap questionnaire, and both together, were compared against no screening. The effectiveness measure for each participant group was the proportion of hearing aid use 1 year after screening. The audiology cost measure included costs of hearing loss screening and audiology care for 1 year after screening. Incremental cost-effectiveness was the audiology cost of additional hearing aid use for each screening group compared with the control group receiving no screening. The mean total audiology cost per patient was 77.04 dollars for the control group, 122.70 for the otoscope group, 121.37 for the questionnaire group, and 157.08 for the dual screening group. The tone-emitting otoscope appeared to be the most cost-effective approach for hearing loss screening, with a significant increase in hearing aid use of 2.8 percent 1 year after screening and an insignificant incremental cost-effectiveness of 1,439 dollars per additional hearing aid user compared with the control group. Based on study results, the authors conclude that for this population of older veterans, screening for hearing loss with the tone-emitting otoscope is cost-effective.
Published by:

VA Rehabilitation Research & Development Service    (Web Site: http://www.rehab.research.va.gov )
Link to text: http://www.rehab.research.va.gov/jour/11/483/liu.html

AbleData, 8630 Fenton Street, Suite 930, Silver Spring, MD 20910. 1-800-227-0216.
Maintained for the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research of the U.S. Dept. of Education
by ICF Macro under Contract No. ED-04-CO-0018/0007.

The records in AbleData are provided for information purposes only. Neither the U.S. Department of Education nor ICF Macro has examined, reviewed, or tested any product, device, or information contained in AbleData. The Department and ICF Macro make no endorsement, representation, or warranty express or implied as to any product, device, or information set forth in AbleData. The views expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Department of Education, the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, or ICF Macro.