Skip navigation View an alternate layout of this website with limited styles and no horizontal scrolling
Menu

Stroke Participants’ Perceptions of Robotic and Electrical Stimulation Therapy: A New Approach

By Hughes, Ann-Marie; Burridge, Jane; Freeman, Chris T.; Donnovan-Hall, Maggie; Chappell, Paul H.; Lewin, Paul L.; Rogers, Eric; Dibb, Bridget; Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 130-138
Publication Date: March 2011

Study sought to understand stroke participants’ experiences of using a novel upper limb workstation that combines robotic therapy and electrical stimulation (ES). Findings would provide greater insight into how such stimulation systems might be improved in the future. Participants were 5 patients aged 38 to 77 years with chronic upper limb hemiplegia post-stroke, of whom 3 were male. Participants used a robotic workstation to undertake supported tracking tasks augmented by precisely controlled ES to their triceps muscle. Following a 6 week trial, a purpose designed set of questions was developed and individual interviews were conducted by an independent health psychologist. The simple, quick to administer question set showed that participants had a positive response to the system and contributed valuable feedback with regard to its usability and effectiveness. Based on participant input, changes were planned to facilitate arm placement in the arm holder and to clarify the system’s graphical display of performance. Ideas for future development included a home-based system targeting the whole arm.
Published by: Taylor & Francis, Limited   (Website:http://taylorandfrancis.org)

International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine    (Web Site: http://www.isprm.org )

AbleData, 8630 Fenton Street, Suite 930, Silver Spring, MD 20910. 1-800-227-0216.
Maintained for the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research of the U.S. Dept. of Education
by ICF Macro under Contract No. ED-04-CO-0018/0007.

The records in AbleData are provided for information purposes only. Neither the U.S. Department of Education nor ICF Macro has examined, reviewed, or tested any product, device, or information contained in AbleData. The Department and ICF Macro make no endorsement, representation, or warranty express or implied as to any product, device, or information set forth in AbleData. The views expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Department of Education, the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, or ICF Macro.