Skip navigation View an alternate layout of this website with limited styles and no horizontal scrolling
Menu

Effectiveness of Using Discrete Utterance Speech Recognition Software

By Kotler, Ava-Lee; Tam, Cynthia; Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC), Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 137-146
Publication Date: September 2002

Study explores text generation speeds, recognition accuracy, and participants’ perceptions of the advantages and disadvantages of using discrete utterance speech recognition software, such as Dragon Dictate. Six people with physical disabilities and intelligible speech participated in the study. The participants were interviewed about their experiences using speech recognition software. While using the software on their home computers, the participants completed five dictation tasks; average individual dictation speeds ranged from nine to fifteen words per minute. Average recognition accuracy ranged from 62 to 84 percent. The authors concluded that voice-recognition software could be used effectively by people who cannot use a keyboard, but that the software could be limited in performing other tasks.

Assistive Products Discussed: DRAGON NATURALLYSPEAKING
Published by: International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (ISAAC)   (Website:http://www.isaac-online.org)

This publication is included in the library of the National Rehabilitation Information Center (NARIC), accession number J44284

AbleData, 8630 Fenton Street, Suite 930, Silver Spring, MD 20910. 1-800-227-0216.
Maintained for the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research of the U.S. Dept. of Education
by ICF Macro under Contract No. ED-04-CO-0018/0007.

The records in AbleData are provided for information purposes only. Neither the U.S. Department of Education nor ICF Macro has examined, reviewed, or tested any product, device, or information contained in AbleData. The Department and ICF Macro make no endorsement, representation, or warranty express or implied as to any product, device, or information set forth in AbleData. The views expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Department of Education, the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, or ICF Macro.