Skip navigation Return to standard layout with columns
Menu

Residual-Limb Quality and Functional Mobility 1 Year After Transtibial Amputation Caused by Vascular Insufficiency

By Arwert, Henk J.; van Doorn-Loogman, Mirjam H.; Koning, Jan; Terburg, Martinus; Rol, Mathilde; Roebroeck, Marij E.; Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, Vol. 44, No. 5, pp. 717-722
Publication Date: 2007

Study identified that residual-limb quality factors that are related to functional mobility 1 year after transtibial amputation. The functional mobility of 28 patients was evaluated 1 year after amputation using the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ), the Locomotor Index, and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. General residual-limb quality was assessed with the Chakrabarty score, a graded summed score that includes soft tissue condition, wound healing, and joint mobility. The maximum possible score is 100 points; a score equal to or greater than 60 points indicates a high-quality residual limb and a score of less than 60 indicates a low-quality residual limb. For bony residual-limb quality, it was determined that the tibial length should be 12 to 15 centimeters (cm) distal from the knee joint line and the fibular length should be 2 to 3 cm shorter than the tibial length to define high quality. Analysis of the data showed that the PEQ, the TUG test, and the Locomotor Index were significantly related to tibial length. A tibial length of 12 to 15 cm distal from the knee joint line correlated with a better functional outcome than shorter tibial lengths. The results regarding the relative fibular length are inconclusive.
Published by:

VA Rehabilitation Research & Development Service    (Web Site: http://www.rehab.research.va.gov )
This publication is included in the library of the National Rehabilitation Information Center (NARIC), accession number J53576

AbleData, 8630 Fenton Street, Suite 930, Silver Spring, MD 20910. 1-800-227-0216.
Maintained for the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research of the U.S. Dept. of Education
by ICF Macro under Contract No. ED-04-CO-0018/0007.

The records in AbleData are provided for information purposes only. Neither the U.S. Department of Education nor ICF Macro has examined, reviewed, or tested any product, device, or information contained in AbleData. The Department and ICF Macro make no endorsement, representation, or warranty express or implied as to any product, device, or information set forth in AbleData. The views expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Department of Education, the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, or ICF Macro.